Techland
At the intersection of business and technology
Type Size  -  +
September 19, 2008, 12:36 pm

Google campaigns for the Yahoo deal

By Yi-Wyn Yen

Google says it’s misunderstood, and it’s stepping up its campaign to set the record straight. This week three of Google’s most visible executives aggressively defended the search giant’s controversial revenue-sharing agreement with Yahoo through multiple blog posts and a news conference.

Since news leaked that the Department of Justice hired one of the nation’s top litigators Sandy Litvack for a possible antitrust case against Google (GOOG) two weeks ago, the search giant has increased its outreach efforts to tell its side of the story.

Google claims there’s a lot of misconception about its pact to outsource a portion of Google ads on Yahoo (YHOO). The deal has been under review by the DOJ for the past three months. Google plans to implement its search pact, which would place Google’s ads on Yahoo’s Web properties, in early October.

There is a growing concern among critics that the deal will allow Google to monopolize search advertising and that having the No. 1 and No. 2 search engines join forces will make the online ad market less competitive. Google’s chief economist Hal Varian and North America advertising president Tim Armstrong together posted three blogs this week arguing that this simply isn’t true.

Meanwhile Google chief executive Eric Schmidt in a news conference Wednesday blamed archrival Microsoft (MSFT) for masterminding the antitrust scrutiny in the press. “We are quite certain Microsoft is busy helping everyone get upset about things,” Schmidt said.

Microsoft spokesperson Jack Evans said the company had no comment on the matter beyond  a congressional testimony made by General Counsel Brad Smith in mid-July.

In an unusual move, a Google exec blasted a report by marketing firm SearchIgnite. Google typically does not comment on third-party studies, but in a blog post Varian rattled off four reasons why the two-month-old report is “flawed” and uses “questionable methodology.” The SearchIgnite study concludes that advertisers could expect to pay 22% more on average for keywords on Yahoo if the Google-Yahoo pact goes through.

Beyond that, the top Google brass aren’t spinning much new information. On Wednesday, Google put out a two-page press release entitled “The Facts about the Yahoo!-Google Advertising Agreement,” which Armstrong repackaged into two posts on Google’s public policy blog on Thursday and Friday.

Google execs stress that the ad-sharing partnership is good for online advertising because Yahoo remains an independent company. After months of acquisition talks with Microsoft, Yahoo ran into Google’s arms on June 12. Yahoo executives said the Google pact was a better choice and could bring in an extra $800 million in annual revenues.

While Google is actively rallying for the deal, Yahoo has remained silent this week. Yahoo spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler says top Yahoo executive Hilary Schneider talked about the company’s commitment to its Google partnership at a Sept. 11 media event.

The big G contends the agreement will ultimately help Yahoo improve its services, but one wonders then why Google is the one doing all the talking this week.

Interesting, Google has a 63% share of the search market. Microsoft has a 90% share of the computer operating system market and 90% share of the “office productivity” suite market; and the profit margin for those products is 80-90%! Yet somehow we’re supposed to believe that Google, which gives away its search results, and other useful things like Picasa and Google Earth, is an evil monopolist, at the same time that we should believe that Microsoft is an angel that’s all sweetness and light. Color me skeptical.

Posted By Jim. Fort Walton Beach, FL : September 20, 2008 7:39 pm

brilliantly said. there andrew i couldn’t add more even i tried.

Posted By macdisser,bronx,new york : September 19, 2008 7:03 pm

Microsoft hates Google, and Google hates Microsoft.

Microsoft wants to buy Yahoo search advertising business so they can try and compete with Google.

Google could care less about Yahoo’s search advertising business, that market share is all going to be Googles in the next 2 years no matter how owns Yahoo.

Yahoo’s executives are keeping quiet because they don’t want to have to explain how they need this deal in order to keep from getting slaughtered by mobs of angry shareholders upset over the way they ran the company into the ground and screwed up the sale to Microsoft.

Google’s out talking about the deal, because they kept Microsoft from getting what they wanted, and are trying to keep them from getting it in the future.

This isn’t complicated; just think of it as two kids fighting over a toy.

Posted By Andrew, Dubuque IA : September 19, 2008 4:30 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Sponsors
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.