BRAVO !!!

They are “back” again ….

Well done ….

If you look at the sorry state of our economy, our corporations, our government, our environment, and so on, ad naseum…you’d realize all these barriers to mergers, monopolies, and trade that the Clinton administration had dismantled (continued by Bush) were put in place to protect us, the US citizens. Removing these barriers was meant to remove these protections of US citizens and foster globalism.

The printing of 100s of trillions of our dollars to use to borrow from China, India, Japan, and other countries was done with the sole intent to devalue our labour, our land, our technology, and ultimately our lives.

Again, Clinton & the business-political Axis of Evil did these things to effectively make us even poorer and more powerless then poorest of the billions of sustenance farmers. At least she has a tiny bit of land that she can scratch some food out of. What the hell can you scratch out of your parking lot? Flattened dogs & cats?

Now we are all on even lesser footing then the billions of people worldwide who never had any protection whatsoever. But then those are the perils of birth and life in the Nanny State whose teats we’ve all been suckling on for far too long.

Think about it. In 1992 if you’d see people like there are on these boards rah’rahing and drawing up sides: Apple vs MS, MS vs Google, Google vs Yahoo, Walmart vs Target people’d rightly think you were insane. They’d be right.

Obama. Hillary. McCain. It matters not who you vote for. They are all control-freak agents of Evil. You’ve let it go too far now.

You only hope is your …

How sad. Land of the FREE? (To speak your mind?)

“Have you seen the erosion of traditional media? Yes, you say? Just wait…the worst of it is yet to come.”

There is no argument there, other than the ongoing phenomenon of Rupert Murdoch and Newscorp buying up all these “traditional media” brands, with The WSJ and now ‘newsday.com’, being the latest … Ever wonder why? (They, NWS now own over 70% of ALL print media in Australia)

Yes. The ‘day to day’ print media publishers will no longer be (no more in “print”), in the not to distant future …(You’d agree?……Few will remain, in the “hard copy” format, as we know it).

They’ll ALL be on the web …. The very same “Brands” …..

But where will the advertisers go to, I wonder? (You have asked the same question)

Along-side ONLINE publisher content, of course. Brands.

And how much (more) will they (advertisers) need to pay then, to get that “favourite” spot that they have been so accustomed to?

They are only getting a “taste” at this stage ………. Soon, they’ll be having to really “pay” for it!!

It’s probably called …Creating “new” habits …….But only an opinion.

“Adsense & Adwords will generate Google north of $100 billion in annual year after 2012.”

I guess that’s why Google have found the need to quickly come up with it’s own, Ad Manager?

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openx_vs_google_ad_manager.php

AdSence? – Cough, splutter.. #* h elp..

You may need to do some more research, possibly?

Google will be “losing it” in more ways than one, let me assure you of that. But, ONLY an opinion, of course.

Watch YHOO get no better over the next 2 quarters before being bought out. Either way, they are going under or under the umbrella of someone else.

Adsense & Adwords will generate Google north of $100 billion in annual year after 2012.

This is just the beginning my friend.

Have you seen the erosion of traditional media? Yes, you say? Just wait…the worst of yet to come.

It will have a bigger implosion than the small housing and credit chrisis we’re coasting through at the moment.

DotCom Mogul

Microsoft are being rather foolish, IMHO.

They should let it go ahead and hope it’s a similar deal as the AOL & FIM were reported to be (80% revs split?) and then see GOOG get to be “tied down” with such exorbitant TAC ….

AdSense is on the way out, and the dogs are barking it …. MSN should be “backing” the more ‘fairer’ auction based Ads/Pubs OPEN Exchange way of doing things. What fools they are, IMO.