Techland
At the intersection of business and technology
Type Size  -  +
March 25, 2008, 10:45 am

YouTube looks for the money clip

By Yi-Wyn Yen

Google’s acquisition of ad server DoubleClick is supposed to help the search giant make a splash in the display advertising market. But it’s YouTube that Google is hoping will make it a big player on Madison Avenue.

“We’re spending a lot of time on YouTube right now because that happens to be a clear objective and clear opportunity,” said Tim Armstrong, Google’s president of advertising at a recent Bear Stearns media conference.

What isn’t clear is why Google (GOOG) hasn’t figured out how to make a profit from YouTube yet.

Google built its multi-billion empire by delivering text-based ads that appeal to marketers looking for a direct response. Now the search engine’s going after major brand advertisers who see video as an opportunity to connect with consumers on an emotional level.

For a company consumed by organizing the world’s information, Madison Avenue is an unfamiliar turf. “They’re starting to think about branding,” said Matt Sanchez, CEO of video ad network VideoEgg. “There’s a culture shift going on at Google.”

While display marketing isn’t Google’s forte, the company has created an appealing branding opportunity with YouTube. The videosharing site has become the go-to site for short, snacky clips. But some advertisers worry that, unlike watching an episode of Lost on ABC.com or a Saturday Night Live clip on Hulu, most of YouTube’s vast collection of campy, user-uploaded clips are unmarketable.

“This is a challenge for advertisers,” said Chris Allen, the video innovation director for media agency Starcom. Roughly 10 to 20% of YouTube’s content is professionally produced. That really starts to diminish the opportunities for brand advertisers.”

One media buyer takes a glass-half full approach. “We’re trying to figure out what is the value in brand association with content that’s not premium,” said Curt Hecht, chief digital officer for GM Planworks, which handles advertising for General Motors (GM). “The approach we take is, how can we package this in front of a ton of eyeballs.”

YouTube is the King Kong of online videos, and what it lacks in marketable clips it makes up for with its massive and engaged audience. In January, nearly 79 million viewers, or a third of all online viewers in the U.S., watched more than three billion user-posted videos on YouTube, according to comScore’s latest report.

However, delivering all those free video clips isn’t cheap. YouTube sends a staggering 1,000 gigabytes of data every second, or nearly 300 billion GBs each month. Several industry insiders estimate that YouTube spends roughly $1 million a day just to pay for the bandwidth to host the videos. By that number, YouTube downloads would account for roughly 3% of Google’s $11.5 billion operating costs for 2007.

YouTube, which makes the bulk of its revenue from selling display ads that run on the right-hand side of the site’s homepage, has not been a moneymaker for Google. The company states YouTube’s revenues last year were “not material” in a regulatory filing. The search giant paid $1.6 billion for the company in October 2006. “I’d be surprised if they broke $20 million in revenue in ’07,” said Anton Denissov, an online video analyst with the Yankee Group.

Part of the problem is that advertisers and companies like Google are still experimenting with what works in the web video market. Advertisers will spend $1.35 billion on online video advertising in the U.S. this year, according to eMarketer. That represents 1.5% of television advertising spending this year, and just 5% of all Internet advertising spending. The research firm forecasts that U.S. spending for web video ads will triple to $4.3 billion in 2011.

Wall Street is anxious for Google to turn the videosharing site into a cash cow. Last October during its earnings call with analysts, Google co-founder Sergey Brin said making money wasn’t a top priority. The company has focused heavily on refining a user’s experience and collecting data on how viewers find videos on YouTube. Dave Eun, who runs Google’s content businesses, said the company would “turn up the dial on monetization” next year.

Last fall Google introduced several types of ad formats with moderate success. Its says viewers are responding favorably to its overlay ads, which run on the bottom of a screen like a sports ticker 10 seconds after a video starts. A viewer can choose to close the ad or click on it to expand the ad before returning to the original clip. The overlay ads only appear on YouTube’s select premium content.

“We’ve been careful about testing different monetization approaches,” Eun said at the Bear Stearns conference on March 10. “We’ve purposely not taken the easy money. And frankly, there was a lot of easy money out there. We could have taken cut-down TV ads and pushed them down our users’ throats with pre-rolls.”

Not everyone is convinced that just because Google flips a switch, the YouTube money will start pouring in. “All of Silicon Valley has a hard time understanding that it’s not some spigot you turn on,” said VideoEgg’s Sanchez. “Maybe that’s how direct marketers work, but media buyers on the brand side don’t spend money that way.”

“There’s no silver bullet,” he added. “Google’s been testing and pushing and marketing its product, but it’s not suddenly going to do a billion dollars in revenue off YouTube.”

I think the original caluclations were made with 1000 Gigabyes per second.

Which means 1000/8*60*60*24*30 =
324 Billion GBytes

So the only logical thing is that some editor along the way changed (1000 Gb) to (1000 Gigabytes per second).

Just to be clear 1 GB = 8 Gb.
A Byte is used to describe storage and a bit is used for bandwith.

Posted By Anonymous : June 15, 2008 12:31 pm

Are the bandwidth calculations right ?

1000 Gbytes per second
= 1000 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 30 Gbytes per month
= 2.6 B Gbytes per month.

So, where did the 300 Gbyte per month number come from ?

Am I doing some thing wrong ?

Posted By Anonymous, USA : April 18, 2008 3:25 pm

Very interesting stats – The bandwidth costs are mind blowing.

Can the $1M per day bandwidth cost estimate be accurate ? Anyone has any thoughts or other comparable stats that indicate accuracy of such staggering numbers ?

Posted By SP, Monmouth Junction, NJ : April 18, 2008 10:02 am

I love YouTube! It’s my favorite site, and would be disappointed if anyone shuts it down because it doesn’t make money. I’m sure that some hungry and innovative small company would be able to do it. Richard In Torrence: Good idea

Posted By Joe in Detroit, MI : March 26, 2008 3:49 pm

Google spent a good bit of time working on their Search Engine before they introduced their ad system. It would appear that their ‘build, test, refine, then monetize’ approach has worked pretty well for them thus far.

Who cares if it takes a year, or two, for Google to figure out how to make money off of videos. They can afford to build a very good system, rather than rushing to market something half-baked.

Posted By Bean Counter, Westchester CA : March 26, 2008 2:33 pm

How about NOT putting ads on previously copywritten works displayed illegally. Adding ads to works where the creator does not receive any royalities or has not permitted the works to be displayed should not be legal.

How about paying content creators for their original works? Its certainly not free to make videos. Why should Google profit without content creators getting a fair shake? Come up with a decent business plan for godsake.

Posted By vc, Chicago, IL : March 26, 2008 2:01 pm

youTube burns mad cash for Bandwidth cost.
something in the order of $2-3 million every week.

how are they going to make up that money? video is there only choice, since many of the videos are embedded into other sites like facebook.

Posted By Anonymous : March 26, 2008 1:56 pm

the 1 million was to pay for the bandwidth host the videos not for monitoring/surveillance.

Posted By Willowbrook, New York, NY : March 26, 2008 1:50 pm

When ever User is uploading video..ask user to select any ad that he want to put in his veido..so that he can also get share of the Ad..if anybody respond to that ad..while surfing the youtube. Catch is user should be able click…thorugh the Ad..which will be easy in flash.

Posted By Loka….Reston : March 26, 2008 1:27 pm

Spending a million dollars a day to monitor how people search for videos? Sounds like Google is running out of ideas. They should sell off YouTube to a company that might be able to do something with it, but I doubt there would be any bidders at $1B.

Posted By Willowbrook, Wayne, NJ : March 26, 2008 12:38 pm

Simple Solution. Have 10 second ads automatically play at the start of the top 10% viewed videos. It is a waste of resources to put ads on everything and will also reduce the social value of You Tube. Restricting it to the top 10% of popular videos assures the advertiser that there ad(s) will be seen.

Posted By Richard, Torrance, CA : March 26, 2008 12:12 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.