Techland
At the intersection of business and technology
Type Size  -  +
March 18, 2008, 2:20 pm

AT&T and Verizon in race to “open up”

By Michal Lev-Ram

The race to be the most “open” wireless carrier is heating up. On Wednesday, Verizon (VZ) will release a set of technical specifications that will enable non-Verizon branded cell phones to work on its network for the first time. Not to be outdone, early Tuesday AT&T (T) unveiled a new website which includes resources for consumers who want to use phones they’ve purchased outside of the carrier’s stores on its network.

Unlike Internet service providers — which are required to allow any laptop, browser or website to run on their networks — most U.S. carriers have historically blocked devices or applications that aren’t directly distributed by them. But more recently, U.S. mobile operators have adopted an “if you can’t beat them, join them” attitude.

Google (GOOG) takes at least some of the credit for the shift.

After it began lobbying for more open networks last year and launched its Android open mobile platform for developers, “AT&T and Verizon started to fight over which one seemed more open,” said Rich Miner, Google’s VP of mobile, at a recent conference.

But Verizon’s decision to open up was also a preemptive response to a government push for giving consumers more control over how they use their cell phones. The carrier’s announcement was strategically timed ahead of the Federal Communications Commission’s high-profile spectrum auction, which set aside a valuable portion of airwaves to be used for a new, open network. Verizon is believed to be the most likely winner of that block of spectrum, though we won’t know for sure until the auction closes — probably sometime in the next few days.

“Verizon Wireless’ Open Development initiative is driven by the company’s desire to encourage innovation, give customers new wireless choices, and quickly address opportunities to expand the wireless market,” the company said in a recent statement. Its open network will be available by end of 2008.

AT&T, of course, maintains that it will win the race.

“The driving force of our business is our commitment to be open to innovation and to offer our customers more choices than any other wireless company,” Ralph de la Vega, president and CEO of the company’s wireless unit, said in a statement.

But critics are skeptical that either carrier will become truly open, making it both simple and affordable for consumers to use outside devices and easy for developers to meet the specifications for getting their applications up and running on the networks.

As AT&T is talking @ “Open”, does it mean that if I buy Iphone separately and still I can use National voice plan on At&T without buying data plan?

Posted By Sshah, herndon VA : April 3, 2008 9:43 am

The SIM based network by AT&T is already an open standard more or less. You can use unlocked phones not sanctioned by AT&T already while plugging into their network via the SIM card. I’ve called up AT&T about this and it seemed they knew this was a common thing now and weren’t suprised or turned me away. It’s just the common public doesn’t fully know about this yet. You definitely can’t do this on Verizon now.

Posted By ricosrealm,SF, CA : March 19, 2008 5:08 pm

the technology of the network will decide which devices you can use. until they make a cheap phone that can work on the different platforms, then and only then will the networks be truely open. in short standardized wireless platforms.

Posted By tboy, lafayette, la : March 18, 2008 11:07 pm

AT&T has always had an open network to some extent. My neice bought a european phone on E-bay and stuck her AT&T sim card in it and it worked fine. In the old days I used to pick up analog phones at garage sales and activate them for friends…

Posted By Bob Johnson, Atlanta, GA : March 18, 2008 3:12 pm

If for one minute you believe AT&T and Verizon are sincere about this, then you are completely wrong. Its just that they will change the game to devices based on specifications they will control. So it will still not be open. But they will market the hell out of the “open” network they have. I’m sorry I just pity them.

Posted By Indy, Orlando, FL : March 18, 2008 2:43 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.