Techland
At the intersection of business and technology
Type Size  -  +
January 25, 2008, 3:54 pm

Are domain names recession-proof?

By Paul Sloan

Global markets are in a state of panic. Credit markets are all but closed. And recession fears are everywhere. But at the conference I attended in Hollywood this week, called DomainFest, you’d have little clue that the financial world was melting down.

The domain world - the people that buy and sell names and make money from pay-per-click ads on their websites - is booming. Downturn? Bring it on.

DomainFest is put on by Oversee.net, a private LA-based company that’s been around since 2000 and has been profitable since day one. Its businesses: managing its own domain portfolio of 700,000 names; running domain name auctions; and using technology to match ads from Google (GOOG) and elsewhere to other people’s domains.

Just last week, Oversee snagged a $150 million investment from Oak Hill Capital, the Silicon Valley private equity firm started by Robert M. Bass of Bass brothers fame. It’s the first time Oversee, with 2007 revenues of more than $200 million, has taken any outside money, and the bet shows huge confidence in the oft-misunderstood domain name industry.

Domain names continue to sell for eye-popping prices. No blockbusters sold at the conference’s live auctions, but all told people plunked down $3.2 million for names. Bookmarks.com fetched $300,000. Photograph.com went for $195,000. Yemen.com: $100,000. And Porn.net sold for $400,000, which seems like a bargain considering that last year Porn.com sold for $9.5 million - in cash.

But the excitement about domain name prices isn’t what’s bringing investors like Oak Hill into the business. It’s the ability a good name has to draw high quality traffic for advertisers. Domain names, often talked about as the real estate of the Web, offer an incredible profit opportunity as more of the world - and more ad money -moves online.

The way most of these sites make money is through what’s known as direct navigation. That’s the term for when someone bypasses the search engine box and instead types a query directly into the address bar. (Shameless plug: An overview of this is in a piece I wrote in 2005, called Masters of Their Domains.)

Someone types in, say, Dreamvacations.com, which is run by Oversee.net. A page pops with a number of categories, such as “all inclusive,” “cruise vacation” and “Disney vacation.” A vacation hunter clicking through is met with a number of sponsored results - relevant ads for each topic. Click on one of those and the advertisers pays a fee – part goes to the ad provider (generally Google) and part goes to Oversee and the domain owner.

A top name - one for, say, a product like digital cameras or vacation packages - attracts the sort of shoppers advertisers want: People essentially raising their hand and saying here’s exactly what I want to buy. As a result, argues Lawrence Ng, the 29-year-old co-founder and CEO of Oversee, “The return on investment for advertisers can be as good as or better than it is for search.”

And because such advertising, known as pay-per-click, is so measurable, much of it should remain strong during a downturn. Oak Hill, in fact, did a study that found that direct advertising has held up far better during bad times than less measurable forms of advertising (think big brand building TV ads and magazine spreads). And pay-per-click ads on websites are the Internet equivalent of direct advertising. “All the data to date shows this is really valuable traffic,” says Robert Morse, a partner at Oak Hill Capital Partners.

Does that mean we should all run out and buy domain names and pack ‘em with ads? Not so fast. Kevin Heisler, the executive editor of Search Engine Watch, has studied the domain world and concludes that when you look at the millions of domain names out there trying to make money from pay-per-click ads, the return on investment from straightforward paid search is better. The top tier domain names are the exception, he says, not the rule. And that explains why some domain names easily fetch six and seven figure sums, even in a down market.

Sahar,

As someone who is known and respected in the domain space, I’m disappointed in your appraisal of the domain industry based on the most recent auctions. The entire point of Paul’s article (and the industry) is not resales. It’s the revenue lines that come from finding the best ad feed/model.

I’m thrilled that the people above think so little of this industry. I get this response every time I attend a trade show adjacent to my industry, and I’m amazed at the response to PPC in the doamin space.

You cannot stop people from navigating directly, and you cannot deny the 1000+ new internet users/day, many of whom click on ads that lead them to something that they find useful.

Posted By JK, Portland, Or : March 29, 2008 1:00 am

There is a strong move underway to “generic” domains. One word domains (like those noted in the article) are all gone and are valuable. Acronym domains, including all 3 letter and 4 letter.com combinations are also all gone and are rapidly rising in value. Finally, numerics, the ultimate “generic” domain names, are hot as well. All the 4 number .com domains, 1827.com are registered and are prime real estate to own, and there are under 20% of the 5 number domains left and these are being rapidly bought out as well. Numerics get good type-in traffic and have multiple uses (zip codes, lucky numbers, part numbers, etc.). And, there is a new trend for numeric domains that spell words, i.e. 466453 takes you to google.com.

Posted By Rick, Silver Spring, MD : February 8, 2008 10:54 am

“Direct search” will become a victim of its own purported success. Eventually people will tire of sorting through the junk sites and Google will get better at sending them to the bottom of the search list. Coupled with decreasing returns on pay-per-click models that do not work (name the last ad you intentionally followed), people are going to be left with a lot of ridiculous domain names with no value.

Posted By Joe, Portland Maine : January 29, 2008 1:37 pm

Paul,
It was obvious to most professionals in the space the auction was not a success, far from it (wrote more about it on my blog)
So to answer your question, domains are not recession proof, and we can already see it.
Cheers
Sahar Sarid

Posted By Sahar, Florida : January 28, 2008 1:25 am

Paul, as the cost to acquire top tier generic domain names keeps rising, interest in the concept of “fractional domain ownership” may begin to accelerate.

The October sale of Cowboys.com to a group of investors organized by Eric Rice of DomainsForMedia.com is an interesting example of how individual investors were each able to get involved in the purchase of a quality generic domain name for just a fraction of the total acquisition cost of $370,000. While each investor only owns a percentage of equity, they could all ultimately benefit significantly from the synergies created by the members of the group.

I believe the opportunities for fractional domaining will dramatically increase in 2008, and I will be keeping an eye on what’s happening via my FractionalDomainingBlog.com site. Feel free to visit!

Posted By Neal R. Voron, Montgomery Township, PA : January 26, 2008 5:07 am

Yes, domain names and internet will be the next gold rush, I expect serious acquistion activities in 2008, European and Asian firms will come after US assets too. Keep an eye on Local.com (LOCM) and Marchex (MCHX), my two favorites, but also think Yahoo and Monster are bigger targets too.

Posted By Greg, Mountain View, CA : January 25, 2008 4:22 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.