Techland
At the intersection of business and technology
Type Size  -  +
January 16, 2008, 1:17 pm

Sun and MySQL: A $1 billion vote for open-source

By Michael V. Copeland

Sun Microsystems is acquiring open-source database company MySQL in a deal worth $1 billion, Sun announced Wednesday.

MySQL CEO Marten Mickos has told me in the past of his intention to take the Swedish company public. He even rebuffed a 2006 offer by Oracle for the company. In recent months, the volume on the chatter about a looming MySQL IPO was increasing, and you can bet Sun (JAVA) heard it as well. Given the size of the offer, and the current state of the public markets, it’s no surprise MySQL brass and its board finally decided to be acquired.

“This type of transaction is very comparable to an IPO,” says Kevin Harvey, a partner at Benchmark Capital and chairman of the MySQL board. “Our intention was to take MySQL public until Sun changed our minds. From a MySQL shareholder perspective it was a fantastic outcome.”

So who are the big winners here? Clearly Sun, which now adds one of the most respected and largest open-source companies to its software arsenal, which, by the way, it needs to squeeze more revenue from. From a Sun shareholder perspective, though, the price it paid is steep and has already set some analysts to grumbling. The other big winner is Harvey and his firm. Benchmark Capital, one of the earliest investors in MySQL, holds a 26% stake now worth more than $200 million. The other early venture investors include Balderton Capital, Index Ventures and Institutional Venture Partners.

The losers include competing opens-source database company PostgreSQL, for which Sun has been selling support services. And then there is Oracle (ORCL). The leading database company can’t be happy about this outcome. MySQL in general is not directly competitive with the top end of Oracle’s database products, but at the low-end there is competition for customers.

But rather than face a blood bath with Sun over the database business, it’s likely some cooperative relationship can be fashioned, much in the same way that Oracle and IBM (IBM) cooperate in the database business.

The true losers are the small time investor that wanted to get into a hot tech IPO that many considered would have the same impact as Apple Computers did when they went public.

Posted By Edward, Manassas, Virginia : January 17, 2008 11:35 am
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.