The battle over next-generation cellular networks
By Michal Lev-Ram
Half the world doesn’t even own a mobile phone but wireless carriers are already fighting over the next-generation cellular network.
Consumers may care less about whether they’ll be using WiMAX, LTE or UMB to download video to their phones or browse the Web faster than ever before. But one by one, mobile operators are aligning themselves with one of these competing next-generation, or 4G, technologies, placing billion-dollar bets on the horse they hope will win the race.
All three of the dueling technologies are Internet Protocol-based and tailored for mobile television, video chat and other data services that eat up a lot of bandwidth.
The first of these technologies to hit prime time will be WiMax, which Sprint (S) is expected to soon launch in three trial markets — Chicago, Washington D.C. and Baltimore. By the end of 2008 the company says it will reach 100 million people with its new network. Motorola (MOT), one of the suppliers of infrastructure equipment — and eventually WiMax-enabled phones — for Sprint’s upcoming service, says it has signed 15 contracts for commercial WiMax networks.
“We’re driving it at about twice the pace of traditional cellular technologies,” Fred Wright, senior VP of Motorola’s home and networks mobility unit, told reporters earlier this week.
WiMax proponents claim that the technology is superior to other 4G standards because it’s faster and more affordable. But Philip Solis, an analyst with New York-based ABI Research, says all 4G networks are more or less created equal.
“The three major 4G technologies are pretty much on par with each other,” says Solis, though he adds that WiMax has already been standardized and deployed.
That didn’t stop Verizon Wireless (VZ) from picking LTE — Long Term Evolution. Solis says LTE isn’t expected to become widely available until 2010, but Verizon says it chose the technology partly because the roaming potential it will have with Vodafone. The British company owns a 40 percent stake in Verizon and has already chosen LTE as its next generation technology.
Although the two largest CDMA carriers in the United States have picked opposing 4G technologies, Motorola’s Wright says that won’t slow adoption of next-gen networks.
“There’s probably more industry confusion that was created than anything else,” he says.
The U.S.’s No. 1 wireless carrier, AT&T (T), has not decided which 4G network it will deploy.
In addition to WiMAX and LTE, AT&T has yet another technology to choose from — Qualcomm’s (QCOM) UMB, or Ultra Mobile Broadband. So far, though, no mobile operator has committed to UBM.
But the bigger question — beyond whether the 4G network of choice will be WiMAX, LTE or UMB –– is whether consumers are as hungry for wireless broadband as carriers think they are.
“We’re all hoping they’ll want to watch TV on their cell phones,” says Qualcomm executive Joe Lawrence.
The phrase is “couldn’t care less” not “could care less” so in your case it’s “may not care less” not “may care less”. It’s amazing how many people don’t say this right!
- Nintendo Wii officially recession-proof
- Kosmix searches for a new way around Google
- Report: Former AOL chief wants to buy Yahoo
- Phone forecast calls for sales decline in 2009
- Hewlett-Packard solid, Corning shattered
- The Xbox 360’s holiday makeover
- Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang to step down
- Mark Cuban faces insider trading charges
- Silicon Valley celebrates do-gooders
- Microsoft gives Windows Live a Facebook facelift
- I just went through a nightmare with ... More
- In 1998, somewhere around there, my n... More
- Bob, I'm sure someone in your office ... More
- Guess I'll join the chorus; without a... More
- dudes..really nice discussion going o... More
- I'm so glad that we we are working to... More
- But the PS3 has better graphics, crap... More
- people just wanna forget about d bad ... More
- This link will take you to a "memo" t... More
- Dude ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;... More




Why bother with 4-Gen? We not got an ROI from 3-Gen Yet.
With Telco’s revenues in decline mainly due to new EU regulation which were designed to drive down tariff in all member states. This overzealous approach is putting increasing demands on CEO’s to “do more with less” a growing number of them are evaluating alternatives to the procedural status quo. An overwhelming number of our executive clients are now considering changing their business model to maintain sustainable revenue growth. Were expecting them to collaboration more with external partners, this may be fundamental in driving new business models.
Expenditure, containment and efficiency have been the key watchwords in the industry since the 3-Gen licence debacle with billions spent gambling on subscribers being eager to gain access to high-speeds data services. As the gamble, starting to pay off, the industry has hit by the savage tariffs cuts imposed by the EU.
Mobile operators are still looking for the “Killer Application”; if new broadband services are to boost AMPU, they need to focus more towards defining Mobile Services as are value proposition that will deliver the expectations of users. To achieve this they need to revise their business models, focusing more on what enterprise customers need to get the job done related to the core mobile service functional requirements, local cultures and demography, if not they could have considerable problem trying to maintaining sustainable revenue growth over the next years.
Mobile services providers want a quick rollout solution while keeping investment in check and uncertainties to a minimum if they are to stay completive.
The business model transformation should recognize most customers basic needs, they want less complexity on the mobile phone and basic services to be more affordable. If mobile providers do not meet this demand they blended, ARPU will never increase.