Techland
At the intersection of business and technology
Type Size  -  +
December 19, 2007, 6:00 am

The battle over next-generation cellular networks

By Michal Lev-Ram

Half the world doesn’t even own a mobile phone but wireless carriers are already fighting over the next-generation cellular network.

Consumers may care less about whether they’ll be using WiMAX, LTE or UMB to download video to their phones or browse the Web faster than ever before. But one by one, mobile operators are aligning themselves with one of these competing next-generation, or 4G, technologies, placing billion-dollar bets on the horse they hope will win the race.

All three of the dueling technologies are Internet Protocol-based and tailored for mobile television, video chat and other data services that eat up a lot of bandwidth.

The first of these technologies to hit prime time will be WiMax, which Sprint (S) is expected to soon launch in three trial markets — Chicago, Washington D.C. and Baltimore. By the end of 2008 the company says it will reach 100 million people with its new network. Motorola (MOT), one of the suppliers of infrastructure equipment — and eventually WiMax-enabled phones — for Sprint’s upcoming service, says it has signed 15 contracts for commercial WiMax networks.

“We’re driving it at about twice the pace of traditional cellular technologies,” Fred Wright, senior VP of Motorola’s home and networks mobility unit, told reporters earlier this week.

WiMax proponents claim that the technology is superior to other 4G standards because it’s faster and more affordable. But Philip Solis, an analyst with New York-based ABI Research, says all 4G networks are more or less created equal.

“The three major 4G technologies are pretty much on par with each other,” says Solis, though he adds that WiMax has already been standardized and deployed.

That didn’t stop Verizon Wireless (VZ) from picking LTE — Long Term Evolution. Solis says LTE isn’t expected to become widely available until 2010, but Verizon says it chose the technology partly because the roaming potential it will have with Vodafone. The British company owns a 40 percent stake in Verizon and has already chosen LTE as its next generation technology.

Although the two largest CDMA carriers in the United States have picked opposing 4G technologies, Motorola’s Wright says that won’t slow adoption of next-gen networks.

“There’s probably more industry confusion that was created than anything else,” he says.

The U.S.’s No. 1 wireless carrier, AT&T (T), has not decided which 4G network it will deploy.

In addition to WiMAX and LTE, AT&T has yet another technology to choose from — Qualcomm’s (QCOM) UMB, or Ultra Mobile Broadband. So far, though, no mobile operator has committed to UBM.

But the bigger question — beyond whether the 4G network of choice will be WiMAX, LTE or UMB –– is whether consumers are as hungry for wireless broadband as carriers think they are.

“We’re all hoping they’ll want to watch TV on their cell phones,” says Qualcomm executive Joe Lawrence.

Why bother with 4-Gen? We not got an ROI from 3-Gen Yet.

With Telco’s revenues in decline mainly due to new EU regulation which were designed to drive down tariff in all member states. This overzealous approach is putting increasing demands on CEO’s to “do more with less” a growing number of them are evaluating alternatives to the procedural status quo. An overwhelming number of our executive clients are now considering changing their business model to maintain sustainable revenue growth. Were expecting them to collaboration more with external partners, this may be fundamental in driving new business models.

Expenditure, containment and efficiency have been the key watchwords in the industry since the 3-Gen licence debacle with billions spent gambling on subscribers being eager to gain access to high-speeds data services. As the gamble, starting to pay off, the industry has hit by the savage tariffs cuts imposed by the EU.

Mobile operators are still looking for the “Killer Application”; if new broadband services are to boost AMPU, they need to focus more towards defining Mobile Services as are value proposition that will deliver the expectations of users. To achieve this they need to revise their business models, focusing more on what enterprise customers need to get the job done related to the core mobile service functional requirements, local cultures and demography, if not they could have considerable problem trying to maintaining sustainable revenue growth over the next years.

Mobile services providers want a quick rollout solution while keeping investment in check and uncertainties to a minimum if they are to stay completive.

The business model transformation should recognize most customers basic needs, they want less complexity on the mobile phone and basic services to be more affordable. If mobile providers do not meet this demand they blended, ARPU will never increase.

Posted By Doc.g Brussels : December 26, 2007 5:42 am

The phrase is “couldn’t care less” not “could care less” so in your case it’s “may not care less” not “may care less”. It’s amazing how many people don’t say this right!

Posted By Terry, Barrington, Il : December 20, 2007 12:01 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Sponsors
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.