<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will developers pledge allegiance to Google mobile?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/</link>
	<description>At the intersection of business and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ike Elliott, Broomfield, CO</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike Elliott, Broomfield, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, one of the most even-handed I have seen on the Android announcement.  Rubin says that completely ad-driven cellphones are a long way off, and I think it is because the ad revenue math doesn&#039;t add up to enough to pay for a handset yet.  More on my blog at http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/free-ad-support.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, one of the most even-handed I have seen on the Android announcement.  Rubin says that completely ad-driven cellphones are a long way off, and I think it is because the ad revenue math doesn&#8217;t add up to enough to pay for a handset yet.  More on my blog at <a href="http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/free-ad-support.html" rel="nofollow">http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/free-ad-support.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent from cleveland (go browns)</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>brent from cleveland (go browns)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Wow, an article which actually looks with some skepticism at Google&#039;s latest plans.  I am astounded, especially after all of the incredible puff pieces I have seen in the past two days about Google&#039;s plan to put ads on my cell phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, an article which actually looks with some skepticism at Google&#8217;s latest plans.  I am astounded, especially after all of the incredible puff pieces I have seen in the past two days about Google&#8217;s plan to put ads on my cell phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kishore Jethanandani,San Francisco, CA</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Kishore Jethanandani,San Francisco, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Carriers have choked innovation in Wireless. You can find a great analysis on the theme at http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/wireless_net_neutrality by Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia&#039;s law school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carriers have choked innovation in Wireless. You can find a great analysis on the theme at <a href="http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/wireless_net_neutrality" rel="nofollow">http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/wireless_net_neutrality</a> by Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia&#8217;s law school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn, Lexington, KY</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn, Lexington, KY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t how this new mobile O/S from Google would be but definitely it would impact Symbian&#039;s Platinum Partner program. Only Symbian Platinum Partner members can only develop hardcore mobile applications on S60 mobile phones and it is way too costly thing for small companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t how this new mobile O/S from Google would be but definitely it would impact Symbian&#8217;s Platinum Partner program. Only Symbian Platinum Partner members can only develop hardcore mobile applications on S60 mobile phones and it is way too costly thing for small companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yiwyn</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>yiwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Fixed. I was basing this on revenue, which Verizon has a lead over AT &amp; T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed. I was basing this on revenue, which Verizon has a lead over AT &amp; T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Atlanta, GA</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Whoa, can you trust CNN for anything?  Wow, AT&amp;T has long been the #1 carrier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, can you trust CNN for anything?  Wow, AT&amp;T has long been the #1 carrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark, St. Louis, MO</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Actually, AT&amp;T is the number one carrier, not Verizon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, AT&amp;T is the number one carrier, not Verizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason, St. Louis Missouri</title>
		<link>http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason, St. Louis Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/07/will-developers-pledge-allegiance-to-google-mobile/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Since when is Verizon the U.S.&#039;s No. 1 carrier?  I assume the measurement being used is the number of customers currently subscribing to each companies network...  Last I checked T still held a healthy lead (and has for some time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when is Verizon the U.S.&#8217;s No. 1 carrier?  I assume the measurement being used is the number of customers currently subscribing to each companies network&#8230;  Last I checked T still held a healthy lead (and has for some time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
